Blakeasd
Apr 30, 03:25 PM
Thanks @kainjow the about box doesn't terminate the app anymore
d4nvu
May 6, 12:36 PM
thanks for the input guys!
i currently have the late-2009 unibody white macbook, would it be worth it to buy the new 2011 13" MBP? I'm just trying to see my options
i currently have the late-2009 unibody white macbook, would it be worth it to buy the new 2011 13" MBP? I'm just trying to see my options
andyx3x
Apr 18, 04:00 PM
Please tell me why all of your phones are on their "last legs"? Do you all have dropsy or something?
I am still using my original iPhone (pre 3G), and it works just as well as it ever did. Still has the same flaws too.
But regardless, unless I drop it in the parking lot or something, I have no reason to believe that it won't still be going a year from now.
If you are spending your money on bigger/better/faster/stronger/new features, I understand that fully.
I don't understand why large quantities of people are commenting on why their phone is about to die?
Either they abuse their phones or are a member of the new generation who think that if a phone is 2 years old, it's on it's "last leg".
I told a friend of mine today who is thinking about buying the iPhone 4 but is worried about all this "outdated technology" talk that if he does and still has the phone 3 or 4 years from now, he'll still have a great phone.
I am still using my original iPhone (pre 3G), and it works just as well as it ever did. Still has the same flaws too.
But regardless, unless I drop it in the parking lot or something, I have no reason to believe that it won't still be going a year from now.
If you are spending your money on bigger/better/faster/stronger/new features, I understand that fully.
I don't understand why large quantities of people are commenting on why their phone is about to die?
Either they abuse their phones or are a member of the new generation who think that if a phone is 2 years old, it's on it's "last leg".
I told a friend of mine today who is thinking about buying the iPhone 4 but is worried about all this "outdated technology" talk that if he does and still has the phone 3 or 4 years from now, he'll still have a great phone.
WardC
Mar 9, 07:51 PM
You can setup AppleShare with a serial cable and install software this way. SHare the CD-ROM drive over the network and install your software onto the Duo over the serial cable via AppleShare with the chooser. This is pretty slow though and you will have to be patient.
sammich
Aug 25, 12:22 AM
Any application itself should run off the system drive. The application doesn't need a dedicated drive to run. I think what your friend means is that you keep all your projects and media used in that project on a dedicated drive. It's those files that will get accessed a lot and if you want smooth, consistent performance you put all of that on a dedicated drive.
XNine
Sep 29, 11:41 AM
Female president of the united states? Yeah, right. We're destined to have white rich yuppies for presidents forever. Since the creation of the country until its demise, that's how it will be. Why? Because there's no way in hell the government would let a "minority" in the leading role. No way at all. Doesn't mean I don't want to see it, I'm just being real here.
Nice fantasy story though.
Didn't care to watch it. I think I was watching Arrested Development or somethign when it came on.
Nice fantasy story though.
Didn't care to watch it. I think I was watching Arrested Development or somethign when it came on.
mkrishnan
Jan 24, 01:15 PM
If I understand you correctly, you don't need a hack. Once you've highlighted the items you want to delete, hit Option-Shift-Delete. You will then get a requester which says something like, "Are you sure you want to permanently delete these items?" And away you go. :)
aquajet
Dec 22, 10:30 PM
The G3 slot-load iMacs used 8x/4x/24x CD-RW drives.
My G3 iMac had a similar problem with a spindle of no-name discs. The first attempt to burn always failed, but if I inserted the disc a second time, it worked. Try burning to the same disc again.
My G3 iMac had a similar problem with a spindle of no-name discs. The first attempt to burn always failed, but if I inserted the disc a second time, it worked. Try burning to the same disc again.
George Knighton
Oct 30, 07:34 AM
Completely misleading. iPad runs a mobile OS that's much less CPU intensive. The iPad is not five times slower in performing everyday tasks like web browsing, e-mail, word processing, etc.
I agree with you that for many of us who need only light use at work every day, the iPad is every bit the competitor to a lightweight net book type of device.
With these kinds of light, but urgent needs, the iPad can be a lot quicker to use than a netbook. It powers up instantly and allows you to to work quickly, then shuts down easily and quickly to allow you to get on with whatever else it was that you were doing in the field.
I'm not saying it replaces a net book or laptop for all of us or even most of us, but if your main purpose on a particular day makes carrying a heavier device difficult, or you are in the field and need something ultimately portable and sturdy, the iPad is a great thing to have around.
We're lucky we have so many great products to pick from, whether you're in the Apple camp or somebody else's camp.
I agree with you that for many of us who need only light use at work every day, the iPad is every bit the competitor to a lightweight net book type of device.
With these kinds of light, but urgent needs, the iPad can be a lot quicker to use than a netbook. It powers up instantly and allows you to to work quickly, then shuts down easily and quickly to allow you to get on with whatever else it was that you were doing in the field.
I'm not saying it replaces a net book or laptop for all of us or even most of us, but if your main purpose on a particular day makes carrying a heavier device difficult, or you are in the field and need something ultimately portable and sturdy, the iPad is a great thing to have around.
We're lucky we have so many great products to pick from, whether you're in the Apple camp or somebody else's camp.
Rt&Dzine
Mar 7, 02:23 PM
And there is PAYE (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAYE) in the UK.
The U.S. has income tax withholdings, but not for all sources of income.
The U.S. has income tax withholdings, but not for all sources of income.
dh2005
May 5, 09:15 PM
why do u hate the magic mouse so much, i love mine, only thing i dont like about it is the battery life, that sucks
Honestly, mate, I don't know where to start...
1). it's heavy. Feels like I'm dragging a brick.
2). the whole unibody thing, whereby the buttons are 'hidden', and you have 'lean' on the edges of it? Design gone mad.
3). the Apple 'gestures' that it supports? Big f**kin' deal.
4). it runs on batteries - which means that its batteries can run out.
5). start again at 1).
Horrible. I probably could've got �30 for it on eBay... but it just stank, so I gave it to my Dad, who'd just bought a Mini. He thought it stank too, and put it in a drawer.
In my opinion? Rubbish. Emperor's New Clothes: "hey, Apple-brains! Use this new piece of crap! It's rrrrrreally awesome! And only �57...!!!"
I never want to see one again, in my life.
The lack of a physical scroll wheel with detents will always deter gamers, especially those that need precision scrolling (i.e. switching between weapons).
Yeah. What he said, too.
Honestly, mate, I don't know where to start...
1). it's heavy. Feels like I'm dragging a brick.
2). the whole unibody thing, whereby the buttons are 'hidden', and you have 'lean' on the edges of it? Design gone mad.
3). the Apple 'gestures' that it supports? Big f**kin' deal.
4). it runs on batteries - which means that its batteries can run out.
5). start again at 1).
Horrible. I probably could've got �30 for it on eBay... but it just stank, so I gave it to my Dad, who'd just bought a Mini. He thought it stank too, and put it in a drawer.
In my opinion? Rubbish. Emperor's New Clothes: "hey, Apple-brains! Use this new piece of crap! It's rrrrrreally awesome! And only �57...!!!"
I never want to see one again, in my life.
The lack of a physical scroll wheel with detents will always deter gamers, especially those that need precision scrolling (i.e. switching between weapons).
Yeah. What he said, too.
Eraserhead
Feb 27, 09:51 AM
From the map it looks like the Russians didn't ratify the treaty.
The US signed the treaty too.
The US signed the treaty too.
DCSMAC
Mar 13, 06:13 PM
would you be interested in trading for a 12" 1.33ghz ibook?
discounteggroll
Apr 29, 11:18 AM
starts the drumroll....
excited to see what the outcome of this is!
excited to see what the outcome of this is!
job
Jun 5, 11:05 PM
Originally posted by vniow
What was the avatar (Mac processor related) that got everybody all riled up?
I have absolutely no idea.
I can think of a few 'tars that have been a bit risque (the cat avatar), a few odd ones (freaky tadpole anyone?), but not one stands out.
Give us a hint. ;)
What was the avatar (Mac processor related) that got everybody all riled up?
I have absolutely no idea.
I can think of a few 'tars that have been a bit risque (the cat avatar), a few odd ones (freaky tadpole anyone?), but not one stands out.
Give us a hint. ;)
100Teraflops
Mar 6, 10:48 PM
I store an archive of my RAW files as DMG images of my memory cards on a large 1TB drive.
I keep a subset of those (keepers) as my working images in my Aperture Library on my system drive.
For 2010...
My RAW file archives consumed about 300GB, which is shooting an average of 1000 pictures per month or so (25MB per RAW image).
My Aperture Library consumed 138GB, which as you can see, is a little less than half of the pictures I took.
If I was you, I would plan on using an External drive to archive your RAW images to, and selectively importing only the ones you feel are "keepers" into your desired photo management application on your system drive. Even if you import all the photos from a shoot to your management app on the system drive, you can later prune it down to keep the size of your working library reasonable.
Periodically, you can also archive your photo management library to an external drive and start a new one on your system drive when it starts to get full.
The bottom line is that with some proper image management, and a large external drive, you can essentially get by with nearly any size of drive on your laptop... it's size will merely dictate how often you need to archive things to your external, which of course, also depends on how much you shoot.
Thanks VirtualRain! That makes a lot of sense using an external drive. As of now, my photos are the same size, but I do not know the size, but I have to enlarge them in order to see detail etc... I will have to think about 'segregating' my photos, as I do not do that currently. However, there is nothing wrong with it, as you point out it is "photo management." :cool:
Also, I was wondering whether the size of the pix utilized more GB, thanks for clarifying this!
I keep a subset of those (keepers) as my working images in my Aperture Library on my system drive.
For 2010...
My RAW file archives consumed about 300GB, which is shooting an average of 1000 pictures per month or so (25MB per RAW image).
My Aperture Library consumed 138GB, which as you can see, is a little less than half of the pictures I took.
If I was you, I would plan on using an External drive to archive your RAW images to, and selectively importing only the ones you feel are "keepers" into your desired photo management application on your system drive. Even if you import all the photos from a shoot to your management app on the system drive, you can later prune it down to keep the size of your working library reasonable.
Periodically, you can also archive your photo management library to an external drive and start a new one on your system drive when it starts to get full.
The bottom line is that with some proper image management, and a large external drive, you can essentially get by with nearly any size of drive on your laptop... it's size will merely dictate how often you need to archive things to your external, which of course, also depends on how much you shoot.
Thanks VirtualRain! That makes a lot of sense using an external drive. As of now, my photos are the same size, but I do not know the size, but I have to enlarge them in order to see detail etc... I will have to think about 'segregating' my photos, as I do not do that currently. However, there is nothing wrong with it, as you point out it is "photo management." :cool:
Also, I was wondering whether the size of the pix utilized more GB, thanks for clarifying this!
claimed4all
Apr 18, 02:27 PM
So those of us that are still using 3gS's (that are on their last leg) should prolly go ahead and get a 4, and then wait for the 6...
How is your 3gs on its last leg? I have a 3g (look at that, no S) and it works just as well as the day I got it.
Why did iphone users think they are "entitled" to a new model every time one comes out?
How is your 3gs on its last leg? I have a 3g (look at that, no S) and it works just as well as the day I got it.
Why did iphone users think they are "entitled" to a new model every time one comes out?
Spikeanator6982
Jun 30, 05:58 PM
these sell for 1800 new... they also come with a $300 ipod touch and a $100 printer. i would be willing to offer 1500, but i dont really think it is worth more than that.
not everyone is a student, and not everyone who isnt is willing to cheat Apple.
not everyone is a student, and not everyone who isnt is willing to cheat Apple.
Rapscallion
May 5, 01:41 PM
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)
Although this is over my budget it's not a bad looking monitor.
http://www.pc-canada.com/item.asp?item=IPS236V%2DPN&utm_source=shopbot&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopbot
Although this is over my budget it's not a bad looking monitor.
http://www.pc-canada.com/item.asp?item=IPS236V%2DPN&utm_source=shopbot&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=shopbot
berkowit28
Aug 7, 10:26 PM
The reason MacBU has had to abandon VBA is that the Mac compiler won't work on Intel Macs. And Microsoft has already announced that VBA is being deprecated on Windows (it will go on working for a few years, then will end). So there's no point devoting enormous efforts to making a new compiler only for it all to go away shortly afterwards. There is some reason to believe that eventually VB.NET will work on the Mac as it does on Windows, as a cross-platform solution. Until then, VBA macros need to be translated to AppleScript. There can be no better signal that MacBU is committeed to the Mac than to see the huge investment they have made in AppleScript. Office's AppleScript is already working as of Office and it mirrors the VBA model identically: macros can be translated to AppleScript _now_, and will then "just work" in the next version of Office too.
iliketyla
Apr 4, 04:11 PM
:(
twentytwo22
Mar 11, 11:45 AM
Any update on the line size at the Gateway?
MacReader
Apr 17, 12:08 AM
Yes, I reset the PMU, I think.
I couldn't find a physical reset button on this model, so I used the four-key combo for about 7 seconds, then let go and powered up the computer.
No difference.
Computer works on AC.
Profiler reports correct statistics for battery.
Battery lights with 4 lights and doesn't look abnormal (no gunk on the contacts, it's in clean condition).
The ring on the AC cord does not light up and the battery does not charge.
I couldn't find a physical reset button on this model, so I used the four-key combo for about 7 seconds, then let go and powered up the computer.
No difference.
Computer works on AC.
Profiler reports correct statistics for battery.
Battery lights with 4 lights and doesn't look abnormal (no gunk on the contacts, it's in clean condition).
The ring on the AC cord does not light up and the battery does not charge.
tizzl10
Sep 9, 09:24 PM
would have been better if it were a picture of you...coming out of one.
No comments:
Post a Comment